USPTO serial 79272675
COMPAIR UNI FLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2021
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with COMPAIR UNI FLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Smith
Matthew J. Smith Polsinelli PC100 S. Fourth StreetSuite 1000St. Louis, MO 63102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Wall boxes of plastic in the nature of wall sleeves in the nature of non-metal vent cover for HVAC ducts, ducts, not of metal for ventilation and air-conditioning installations or electrical circuitry, and ventilation ducts; plastic air intake and outtake duct systems for domestic engineering, mainly consisting of tubes and junction pieces and air ducts, in particular ventilation and extraction ducts of plastic for kitchens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Naber Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Naber Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Naber Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named COMPAIR UNI FLOW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |