USPTO serial 79272737
CARS COMPOSITE APURNA RESONANCE SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARS COMPOSITE APURNA RESONANCE SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FR
F-07500 Guilherand-Granges, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission, reproduction or processing of sound or images; amplifiers; sound amplifying apparatus; magnetic recording media; sound recording media; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; digital recording media; sound recording disks; optical disks; compact disks (audio-video); DVDs; radios; compact disk players; vinyl disk players; Super Audio CD players; DVD players; compact disk recorders; vinyl disk recorders; Super Audio CD recorders; DVD recorders; hi-fi sound systems; loudspeakers; television sets; video projectors; connection stations for digital players; loudspeaker cabinets; loudspeaker cabinets with controlled-elasticity walls | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development of new products for others in the field of High-Fidelity (Hi-Fi); study of technical projects in the field of high fidelity (hi-fi); design of interior decor; graphic arts designer services in the field of High-Fidelity (Hi-Fi); styling (industrial design) in the field of high fidelity (hi-fi) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 16, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |