Drawing for COCO·COZI

USPTO serial 79272743

COCO·COZI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COCO·COZI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L JEREMY CRAFT

L JEREMY CRAFT CRAFT CHU PLLC1204 HEIGHTS BOULEVARDHOUSTON, TX 77008UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Headwear; scarfs; children's clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, pants, coats, dresses, skirts and socks; shoes; hosiery; outerclothing, namely, coats, jackets and vests; trousers; underwear; gloves; leather belts for clothing; wedding dresses; ready-made clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, pants, coats, dresses, skirts and socksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2021MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 5, 2021ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 5, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 5, 2021OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 25, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 2020OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2020OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Sep 29, 2020OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 1, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 8, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 7, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance