USPTO serial 79273036
LASER BALANCING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIMCOX, KYLE DUNCAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LASER BALANCING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne Abelman
Julianne Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 THIRD AVE, 10TH FLNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Vacuum pumps; vacuum pumps and vacuum pump stations consisting of vacuum pumps; turbo molecular pumps; drives and shaft bearings for vacuum pumps; parts specifically adapted for vacuum pumps and vacuum pump stations, namely, oil separators, condensate separators, dust separators, oil coolers being vacuum engine parts, filters, vapor condensers, flanges being machine parts and mechanical control apparatus being control valves for pumps; valves being parts of machines; vacuum installations, comprised primarily of vacuum pumps, and also comprising parts specifically adapted for vacuum pumps, specifically oil separators, condensate separators, dust separators, coolers, filters, vapor condensers, flanges and mechanical control apparatus being control valves for pumps, connecting cables, valves being parts of machines, vacuum containers and process-related work holding fixtures being parts of vacuum pumps; Structural parts for vacuum pumps, namely, vacuum-tight, mechanical and electrical feedthroughs, specifically current feedthroughs, thermocouple feedthroughs, fluid feedthroughs, pipe feedthroughs, rotary feedthroughs, rotary/linear motion feedthroughs, linear motion feedthroughs, all aforementioned being specifically adapted as parts of vacuum pump installations; Structural parts of vacuum pumps and mechanical control apparatus being control valves for pumps for vacuum pumps and vacuum pump stations | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Measuring apparatus, namely, leak detection apparatus, residual gas analyzers, mass spectrometers, digital force gauges, force gauges, vibration gauges, magnetic field gauges, none of the aforementioned goods containing lasers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |