USPTO serial 79273202
SANNOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANNOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Information technology and audiovisual equipment; magnets, magnetizers and demagnetizers; measuring, detecting and monitoring instruments, indicators and controllers; navigation, guidance, tracking, targeting and map making devices; optical devices, enhancers and correctors; recorded content; safety, security, protection and signalling devices; scientific research and laboratory apparatus, educational apparatus and simulators; apparatus, instruments and cables for electricity; scientific devices for treatment using electricity; diving equipment; apparatus, instruments and cables for electricity; laboratory devices for treatment using electricity; diving equipment; information technology and audiovisual equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |