USPTO serial 79273339
GTM GLOBAL TECH MAKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GTM GLOBAL TECH MAKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer system analysis; outsource service providers in the field of information technology; material testing; recovery of computer data; off-site data backup; research and development of new products for others; research in the field of telecommunications technology; duplication of computer programs; electronic data storage; energy auditing; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; providing search engines for the Internet; cloud seeding; engineering; installation of computer software; computer programming; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; computer technology consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; Internet security consultancy; data security consultancy; information technology (IT) consultancy; computer software consultancy; computer security consultancy; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; web site design consultancy; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; platform as a service (PaaS); data encryption services; computer virus protection services; conducting technical project studies; software as a service (SaaS); computer system design; computer software design; rental of computer software; hosting computer sites (web sites); development of computer platforms, software development in the framework of software publishing; technical writing; creating and maintaining web sites for others; creating and designing website-based indexes of information for others (information technology services); technological consultancy; cloud computing; server hosting | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |