Drawing for MOSKITOFREE

USPTO serial 79273623

MOSKITOFREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOSKITOFREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander J.A. Garcia

Alexander J.A. Garcia PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005sanitary products in the nature of insect repellents; parasiticides; insecticides; insect repellents; insect repellent for human beings and animals; products for treatment of housing and buildings against pests, namely sanitary products; products for disposal and destruction of pests and insects, namely sanitary products; mothproofing preparations; fungicidesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Apparatus for diffusing insecticides or insect repellents into the ambient air, namely, electric air diffusers; ionization apparatus for the treatment of airSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 26, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 29, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 22, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 14, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 13, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance