USPTO serial 79273689
MORETOTHECITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MORETOTHECITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Encoded cards; encoded passes; electronic cards; electronic passes; downloadable computer software applications relating to entertainment, cultural, recreational and leisure attractions and activities; downloadable on-line electronic publications providing information relating to entertainment, cultural, recreational and leisure attractions and activities | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services; cultural services; providing on-line electronic publications (not downloadable); providing information relating to entertainment, cultural, recreational and leisure attractions and activities; providing information about entertainment, recreational, cultural and leisure attractions and activities via an interactive website; ticket reservation and booking services for entertainment, recreational, cultural and leisure attractions and activities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |