USPTO serial 79273737
ECREDITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECREDITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware for data processing, computers; electronic commerce software for conducting electronic commercial transactions on a global computer network, with the exception of software for the administration, processing and granting of electronic credit | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; commercial business management; commercial administration; office functions | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Issuance and redemption of digital vouchers and tokens without electronic credit granting; electronic payment services with the exception of payment services for electronic credit granting; currency exchange without electronic credit granting | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services as well as related research and design services with the exception of electronic credit granting services and not with reference to electronic credits; industrial research and analysis services; design and development of computer hardware and software, with the exception of software for granting electronic credit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2020 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |