USPTO serial 79273742
SONIC HONING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SONIC HONING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mining bits for mining machines; drilling inserts for rock drilling; bits for power drills; drill inserts for power drills; electric drills; power-operated drills in the nature of power tools; milling-drilling machines; milling-drilling cutters; drill chucks being parts of machines; electric hammer drills; electric rotary hammers; drilling heads being parts of machines; drilling bits being parts of machines; drilling machines; boring machines for metalworking; drilling machines and parts therefor; boring machines; mining bits; drilling rigs; electric hand-held drills; electric rotary hammer drills; center drill bits being parts of machines; centering drills being parts of machines; drill presses being machines; drill chucks for power drills; chucks for power drills; power tools, namely, countersinks; floating or non-floating drilling rigs; well drilling machines; column drilling machines; electric radial drills; radial drilling machines; hand-held pneumatic drills; power ice augers used in ice fishing; electric hand drills; electric drilling machines; earth augers; mine borers; rock drilling bits; rock drills being machines; taps being machine tools; taps as machine tools; die-cutting and tapping machines; pneumatically operated hand-held drills; hand-held pneumatic power drills; wood drilling machines; core drilling bits; drill sharpening machines; machines for sharpening drills; pneumatically operated hand-held power drills; honing machines for metalworking; machine tools, namely, clamping tools for holding piece parts during machining; industrial robots; robotic arms for industrial purposes being parts of industrial robots; belt sanding machines; electric sanders; grinding machines; grinding machines for metalworking; grindstones being parts of machines; grinding tools being parts of machines; tool grinding machines; lapping machines; lapping machines for metalworking; lifting apparatus, namely, mechanical and hydraulic lifts; hydraulic lift tables; power-operated punches for punching machines; parts and spare parts for all aforementioned goods; all aforementioned goods not for honing by means of sound | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of drilling and mining tools; drill bit sharpening; installation, maintenance and repair of honing and grinding machines; all the aforementioned services not in the field of honing by means of sound; rental of drilling and mining apparatus, which are not used for honing by means of sound; buffing and polishing not by honing with sound; advice and provision of information on all the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials by means of grinding, polishing, and abrading; grinding; polishing by abrasion; treatment of materials, namely, processing of metal surfaces by precision grinding and abrasive polishing; treatment of materials, namely, processing of metal surfaces by abrasive polishing; treatment of materials, namely, processing of metal surfaces using precision grinding techniques; all the aforementioned services are not provided by means of honing with sound; rental of grinding machines, which are not used for honing by means of sound; advice and provision of information on all the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |