USPTO serial 79273850
HIERSEMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIERSEMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automation and assembly installations, mainly consisting of mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic and electric components as well as control technology, control engineering and control systems thereof and handling technology, namely, robots, included in this class; machine tools; special-purpose machines for assembly, transport, storage and testing processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computers, computer peripheral devices and data processing equipment; electronic controllers; computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services for industrial application of computers, in particular in the fields of process automation and process control; upgrading of computer software for automation technology; design, upgrading, installation and maintenance of computer software; consultancy in the fields of design and development of computer hardware; technical consultation services for the use of computer hardware and software, in particular in the field of process automation and/or process control; construction drafting, construction consultancy as well as technical planning and providing of expertise in the fields of plant engineering, machine tool engineering and special-purpose mechanical engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 26, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |