USPTO serial 79273869
MENIGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MENIGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in financial, accounting, banking and management information services and sectors; computer software for use by entities offering financial services; computer software for online banking services; computer software to enable users to access transaction and account information in connection with electronic funds transfers and electronic payments | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Electronic processing of payment data; electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; online banking services, namely, providing account balance information via a global communications network, in particular information about account balance in bank accounts, deposit accounts, credit accounts, and checking accounts; online funds transfer services; online bill payment services; online account opening services, namely, opening of bank, deposit, credit and checking accounts | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development, installation, updating and maintenance of computer software for use in connection with digital banking, electronic funds transfer and electronic payment processing; and providing outsourcing services in the field of information technology in relation to business process management; information technology consultancy in relation to Information Technology Enabled Services; software development services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |