USPTO serial 79273972
1-CLICK REPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MISCHLER, MEGAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 1-CLICK REPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy D. Gross
Roy D. Gross The Roy Gross Law Firm, LLC50 Washington Street, Suite 737/745Norwalk, CT 06854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Smartphones, cameras, inertial measuring units, radar, lidar and other acceleration sensors located in or on motor vehicles; downloadable computer software and computer hardware located in moving vehicles for processing data generated by smartphones, cameras, inertial measuring units, radar, lidar and other acceleration sensors located in or on the motor vehicles; downloadable computer software and computer hardware located in motor vehicles for digitizing and recognizing objects on streets, roads and highways, namely, traffic congestion, infrastructure defects, road hazards, collisions, construction, other vehicles, road marks, road signs, traffic lights, available parking spots, parking violations, vehicle advertising signs and other objects; downloadable computer software and computer hardware for collecting, processing aggregating and distributing data generated by remote sensors, namely, data generated by smartphones, cameras, inertial measuring units, radar, lidar and other sensors located in or on motor vehicles; downloadable computer software and computer hardware for motor vehicle dashboard camera applications for smartphones and other computer devices; downloadable computer software and computer hardware for high-definition mapping; downloadable computer software and computer hardware for street-view image databases | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Collecting, processing and aggregation of electronic data generated by sensors, namely, data generated by smartphones, cameras, inertial measuring units, radar, lidar and other sensors located in or on motor vehicles, for business purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of information inferred from data generated by sensors, namely, data generated by smartphones, cameras, inertial measuring units, radar, lidar and other sensors located in or on motor vehicles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |