Drawing for CORE

USPTO serial 79273980

CORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES P LAPOLLA

CHARLES P LAPOLLA AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Electric bicyclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 16, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 16, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 3, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 24, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 12, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 6, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 6, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 6, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 21, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 20, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance