USPTO serial 79274241
SKIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEHMER, JASON ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah Voeller
Sarah Voeller Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, PC45 S. 7th St., Suite 2700Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aloe vera preparations for cosmetic purposes; make-up powder; toilet soap; shampoos; cosmetic preparations for skin care; skin whitening cream; skin lotions; nail care preparations; tissues impregnated with make- up removing preparations; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; dry shampoos; cosmetic acne cleansers; Non-medicated skin care cosmetic preparations adapted for acne-prone skin; nail polish; nail enamel removers; beauty masks; hair conditioners; hair spray; hair lotions; hair lotion; cosmetic pencils; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; eyebrow cosmetics; make-up preparations; lip gloss; non-medicated lip balm; toilet water; cosmetics; almond milk for cosmetic purposes; aloe vera gel for cosmetic purposes; greases for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic cream; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; cotton balls for cosmetic purposes; gel eye patches for cosmetic purposes; hair nourishers for cosmetic use; lotions for cosmetic purposes; petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; adhesives for cosmetic purposes; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; bleaching preparations being deodorants for cosmetic purposes; make- up removing preparations; cosmetic racial toners; lipsticks; breath freshening sprays; mouthwashes, not for medical purposes; Non-medicated industrial soap; perfumes and aromatics for fragrances; cosmetics for children; cleansers for intimate personal hygiene purposes, non-medicated; breath freshening preparations for personal hygiene; vaginal washes for personal sanitary or deodorant purposes; douching preparations for personal sanitary or deodorant purposes; antiperspirant soap; antiperspirants; essential oils; eye-washes, not for medical purposes; cleaning preparations; laundry soap; laundry bleach; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; color-removing preparations for hair; hair moisturizers; sunscreen preparations; sun-tanning preparations ; milky body lotions; beauty serums; cloths impregnated with a detergent for cleaning facial moisturizers; deodorant soap; tooth paste" | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |