USPTO serial 79274276
MOTION DESIGN SCHOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOTION DESIGN SCHOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consultancy regarding advertising communication strategies in online education; marketing in online educational products publishing; marketing in the framework of software publishing; scriptwriting for advertising purposes; media relations services; online retail services for downloadable digital music; online retail services for downloadable and pro-recorded music and movies | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Online educational services; arranging and conducting of education conferences; providing online educational videos, not downloadable; providing online electronic educational publications, not downloadable; education information about motion design; tutoring motion design; coaching (training) motion design; recording studio services; music composition services; practical training (demonstration) in motion design; online publication of electronic books and journals; production of music; film production, other than advertising films; subtitling; photography | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Graphic design of promotional materials; providing information on computer motion design technology and programming via a web site; computer programming for motion design software; computer motion design software consultancy; web site motion design consultancy; maintenance of motion design computer software; online education platform as a service (PaaS); online education software as a service (SaaS); motion design software development in the framework of software publishing; creating and maintaining web sites for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |