Drawing for EMY

USPTO serial 79274513

EMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAURA POPP-ROSENBERG

LAURA POPP-ROSENBERG FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42ND ST., 17TH FL.NEW YORK, NJ 07305UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer programs for medical use, namely, for providing Kegel exercises and pelvic floor training exercisesABANDONED—
010Medical devices for Kegel exercises, namely, pelvic floor exercisers for use to treat symptoms of urinary incontinence and for therapeutic purposes; medical apparatus for physical exercise, apparatus and instruments for pain relief namely electrical stimulation apparatus, electromyography apparatus; physiotherapy apparatus for treating incontinence; apparatus for testing or strengthening pelvic floor muscles for medical use; electro-myopathy apparatus for medical purposes; pelvic muscle stimulators for medical purposes; medical apparatus and instruments, in particular vaginal cones and manually-operated physical therapy apparatus for remedial gymnastics and rehabilitation; apparatus, equipment and devices for controlling, treating or preventing incontinence in human beings; electric or electronic sensors for medical use for detecting, measuring, processing, collecting, recording and transmission of general data in connection with muscle pain; vaginal probes for medical purposes; pelvic muscle stimulator for medical purposes; sex toys; massagers for intimate areas; massagers for sexual stimulation; adult sexual stimulation aids, namely vibrators for personal use; genital stimulation rings; adult sexual stimulation aids, namely dildos, geisha ballsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2022MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 18, 2022ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 18, 2022OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 18, 2022OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2021RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2021OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 4, 2021OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2021OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Apr 15, 2021CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 15, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2021CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 16, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2021OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 25, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 30, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 23, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance