Drawing for CARENOLOGY95

USPTO serial 79274648

CARENOLOGY95

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CARENOLOGY95?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Face mask pack (cosmetics); make-up; moisturizers (cosmetics); beauty treatment pack; body wash; non-medicated toilet preparations; shampoo-conditioners; sun block cosmetics; serums (cosmetics); skin lotions; skin care lotions; nourishing cream (cosmetics); sanitary preparations being toiletries; soaps for personal use; anti-wrinkle creams; cosmetic preparations for face and body; cosmetic soaps; make-up removing preparations; cosmeticsACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring beauty treatment pack; wholesale store services featuring beauty treatment pack; retail store services featuring shampoos; wholesale store services featuring shampoos; retail store services featuring sanitary preparations being toiletries; wholesale store services featuring sanitary preparations being toiletries; retail store services featuring cosmetic soaps; wholesale store services featuring cosmetic soaps; retail store services featuring cosmetics; wholesale store services featuring cosmetics; business intermediary services relating to the purchase and sale of make-up preparations; business management services within the framework of franchising in relation to the sale of cosmetics; marketing agency services in the field of cosmetics; business management services within the framework of franchising in relation to arranging the sale of cosmetics; retail of cosmetics via the InternetACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture of massage pack; custom manufacture of shampoos; custom manufacture of sanitary preparations being toiletries; custom manufacture of cosmetic soaps; custom manufacture of cosmetics; custom manufacture of cosmetic casesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 5, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 3, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 11, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 10, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance