USPTO serial 79275018
JOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAUCETTE, MAX CLIFFORD STE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Espenshade
Steven M. Espenshade Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th StreetSuite 300Austin, TX 78702Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | air fryers; electric tea kettles; electric toaster ovens; electric food steamers; electric sous-vide immersion circulator cookers; electric cooktops; electric induction cooktops for household purposes; electric coffee makers; electric coffee brewers; electric espresso making machines; electric grills for household purposes; electric griddles; hot plates; microwave ovens; electric pressure cookers, slow cookers; electric fans; machine using heat and steam to pasteurize and sanitize dishes and kitchen utensils being sterilizers, and parts and fittings therefor; constant temperature circulators in the nature of water heaters; thermal immersion circulators for cooking for household purposes; electric cooking ovens for household purposes; baking ovens for household purposes; electric appliances for making yogurt; bread making machines; electric roasters for household purposes; electric deep fryers; electric food dehydrators; ice cream making machines; breadmakers, namely, bread-making machines; electric rice cookers; induction hobs; electric grills; electric popcorn makers, and component parts and fittings therefor; refrigerated drinking water dispensing units, and component parts and fittings therefor; refrigerators; electric bread toasters; beverage cooling and ice dispensing machines; heaters for baths, namely, hot water heaters; freezers; gas purification machines; electric heaters for baby bottles; cooking stoves; electric autoclaves for cooking; electric cooking pots and frying pans; barbecues; electric and gas cooktops; gas stovetop burners; built-in gas cooktop burners; electric hobs; cooking apparatus, namely, cooktops; cooking installations, namely, cooking ovens, and component parts and fittings therefor; appliances for cooking foodstuffs, namely, microwave ovens for cooking, convection ovens, steam ovens for cooking, electromagnetic induction cookers for household purposes, and electric grills, and component parts and fittings therefor; electric cooking utensils, namely, electric rice cookers, electric autoclaves for cooking, and electric pressure cookers, and component parts and fittings therefor; electric food warmers; food steamers, electric; electric multi-purpose cookers for household use; electric steam cookers, namely, electric rice and vegetable steamers, and component parts and fittings therefor; electric and gas cookers with integrated grills; electric and gas cookers with incorporated eye level grills; hot plates for cooking; electric pans for stewing and boiling food; electric frying pans; electric egg cookers; electric ramen noodle cookers; stands specially adapted for electric rice and pressure cookers, and multi cookers; barbecue apparatus, namely, barbecue grills, barbecue smoker cooking grates, and cooking grates adapted for barbecue grills; beverage cooling apparatus; electric sous-vide cookers; electric slow cookers; electric waffle irons; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2024 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |