USPTO serial 79275116
RINOMATA ROSTICCERIA SAN CARLO 1936
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RINOMATA ROSTICCERIA SAN CARLO 1936?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish; poultry; game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; dried nuts; dried fruit; jellies; marmalade; fruit compotes; eggs; milk and milk products; edible oils and fats; snack products, including, potato crisps, french fries, potato chips, potato flakes, potato-based preparations, flavoured or unflavoured potato-based products, products based on potato flakes, savoury or flavoured seeds; fruit-based snack food | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; rice; rice-based snack food; tapioca and sago; flour and preparations made from cereals; farinaceous foods; foodstuffs made from dough; prepared savory foodstuffs made from potato flour; foodstuffs made from cereals; snack food products made from potato flour; snack foods made from corn; snack foods prepared from maize; maize flakes; tortilla chips; ready-to-eat extruded savoury snacks based on cornflour; cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; popcorn; cereal-based snack food; taco chips; cheese curls [snacks]; cheese curls [snacks]; whole wheat crisps; flour based chips; crackers flavoured with cheese; snacks based predominantly of rice on extrusions; extruded food products made of wheat; extruded food products made of maize; pellet-shaped rice crackers; waffles; bread; wholemeal bread; pumpernickel; toasted bread; breadcrumbs; thin breadsticks; croutons; rusks; crackers; salted biscuits; rice crackers, including being fried; bakery goods, pastries and confectionery, including, croissants, buns, filled buns, crostatas (tarts), buns (muffins), sponge cake, toasts [biscuits], aperitif biscuits, wafers, confectionery bars, plum cakes, caramels, gum sweets, filled sweetmeats, bubble gum; edible ices; sugar, honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; ice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |