USPTO serial 79275144
OMNIBLONDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2020
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with OMNIBLONDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
København K, DK
København K, DK
København K, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna W. Manville
Anna W. Manville Edell, Shapiro & Finnan LLC9801 Washingtonian Boulevard, Suite 750Gaithersburg, MD 20878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Shampoos, hair conditioners, hair masks and non-medicated hair serums ; non-medicated hair care preparations and treatments for cosmetic purposes; creams and oils for hair conditioning; preparations for setting hair; hair lighteners; non-medicated cosmetics and toiletry preparations; perfumery, essential oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hair brushes and hair combs; hair for brushes, namely, animal bristles for brush-making; electrically heated hair brushes; electric rotating hair brushes; hair tinting brushes; hair color application bottles; hair tinting bowls; fitted holders for hair brushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 25, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |