USPTO serial 79275201
JOHN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JOHN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shauna M. Wertheim,
Shauna M. Wertheim, The Marbury Law Group, PLLC15th Floor11800 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA 20191Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated soaps and detergents for personal uses; cakes of soap; cosmetics; hair shampoos; hair rinses; non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; hair conditioners; hair mist having an aromatization effect or fragrance effect in the form of spray, namely, fragrances; toilet waters; non-medicated bath salts; bath preparations, not for medical purposes; perfumes; perfumes in solid form; hand creams; perfumery; incenses and fragrances; air fragrancing preparations; fragrances for automobiles; air fragrance reed diffusers; fabric softeners for laundry use | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services and wholesale store services featuring soaps and detergents, cakes of soap; retail store services and wholesale store services featuring cosmetics, hair shampoos, hair rinses, hair treatments, hair conditioners, hair mist having an aromatization effect or fragrance effect in the form of spray, toilet waters, bath salts, bath preparations not for medical purposes, perfumes, perfumes in solid form, hand creams; retail store services and wholesale store services featuring perfumery; retail store services and wholesale store services featuring incenses and fragrances, air fragrancing preparations, fragrances for automobiles, air fragrance reed diffusers; retail store services and wholesale store services featuring fabric softeners for laundry use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |