USPTO serial 79275386
UMFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UMFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Parts and accessories for telecommunication machines and apparatus; personal digital assistants; electronic machines, apparatus and their parts; computer programs; computer software, recorded; computer software applications, downloadable; phonograph records; downloadable music files; downloadable image files; recorded video discs and video tapes; game programs for home video game machines; electronic circuits and CD-ROMs recorded with programs for hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; electronic publications; exposed cinematographic films; exposed slide films; slide film mounts | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; maintenance of computer software; installation of computer software; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; rental of computers; providing computer programs on data networks; cloud computing; software as a service [SaaS]; hosting computer sites [web sites]; platform as a service [PaaS]; computer technology consultancy; computer system analysis; designing of machines, apparatus, instruments [including their parts] or systems composed of such machines, apparatus and instruments; designing, other than for advertising purposes; technological advice relating to computers, automobiles and industrial machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |