USPTO serial 79275520
TRINITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REID, CAILE MAUREEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRINITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Molds being parts of machines for processing plastics for use in the manufacture of plastic window and door frame;die-stamping machines; Molds being parts of machines for used in die casting process for use in the manufacture of metal handle; dynamos; starters for motors and engines; Self-lubricating mechanical friction parts, especially of composite materials, namely, wear rings, washers, bushings, spherical bearings, bearing pads, sliding blocks and machine transmission gears all for load bearing machines, conveyors, handling trucks and machines, lifting machines, agricultural machinery, construction equipment machines and hydraulic turbines; Valves being part of plastic jet moulding machines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2020 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |