Drawing for OGP

USPTO serial 79275686

OGP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6230744Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 29, 2020
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with OGP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura M. Konkel

Laura M. Konkel Michael Best & Friedrich LLP790 N. Water Street, Suite 2500Milwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Rose oil for cosmetic purposes; Eyebrow pencils; lipstick; ] cosmetics; beauty masks; [ dentifrices; ] ethereal oilsACTIVE—
005Pharmaceutical preparations for skin care [ ; Dietetic foods adapted for medical purposes; Vitamin preparations; Greases for medical purposes; Sanitary pads; Baby diapers; Liniments ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 20, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 23, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 15, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 30, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 5, 2021XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2021XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 29, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 29, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 18, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 14, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance