USPTO serial 79275975
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sang Ho Lee
Sang Ho Lee Novick, Kim & Lee, PLLC3251 Old Lee HighwaySuite 404Fairfax, VA 22030| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Courier transport services; providing traffic information via mobile applications; logistics services consisting of the storage, transport and delivery of goods; inbound and reverse logistics, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of goods for others; logistics services consisting of the transportation, packaging, and storage of goods; delivery of goods; transport, storage and packaging of goods; goods warehousing; packaging of goods for transportation; provision of tourist travel information; travel ticket reservation service; booking of seats for travel; delivery of processed food ordered via online networks; delivery of goods ordered by on-line networks and the Internet; postal, freight and courier services; storage of oil; transportation and storage services relating to storage logistics, distribution logistics and returns logistics, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of goods for others; physical storage of electronically-stored data; depot services for the storage of vehicles; rental of warehouses; transportation logistics information via computer communication networks; packaging and storage of goods; transport and packaging of goods; parcel delivery; transport of goods; transportation information; courier services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 26, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |