Drawing for ONE GRAND

USPTO serial 79276083

ONE GRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JOHNSON, DANYTHE ELIZABETH HA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE GRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ADAM BELL, ESQ.

ADAM BELL, ESQ. Bell & Associates LLC58 West Portal Avenue #121San Francisco, CA 94127UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Purses; luggage; bumbags; leather pouches; hipsacks; luggage, bags in the nature of handbags, wallets and other carriers in the nature of backpacks, fanny packs, weekender duffle bags and tote bags; bags for sports; credit-card holders; trunks in the nature of travelling trunks and suitcases; gentlemen's handbags; cosmetic bags and cases, sold empty; rucksacks; suitcases with wheelsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 27, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 27, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 27, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jul 27, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 26, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2020RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED
Jun 10, 2020RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED
Jun 10, 2020RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED
May 21, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 21, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 20, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 15, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 14, 2020GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
May 14, 2020GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
May 14, 2020CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Apr 22, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 21, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 21, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 21, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 21, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 30, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 27, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Mar 27, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 15, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 14, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 10, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 9, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance