USPTO serial 79276175
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy products; milk; milk powder; milk products; milk beverages; butter; cream; dairy spreads; edible oils and fats; food spreads being a blend of edible oils and edible fats; spreads made from vegetable oils; crème fraîche; cheese; yoghurt; yoghurt beverages; yoghurt powder; fromage frais; snack foods and snack dips (terms considered too vague by the international bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the common regulations) | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |