USPTO serial 79276210
DEFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, ALINA S.
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica D. Klein
Erica D. Klein Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town CenterSouthfield, MI 48075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services, including those in relation to the electronic transfer of funds; Collection of payments, namely, payment transaction processing services; Computerized banking services; Computerized financial services, namely, electronic funds transfer, deposit, withdrawal, and processing services; Computerized transfer of funds; Electronic banking via mobile application or a global computer network; Electronic money transfer services; Electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment and collection data; Financial payment transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options; Payment processing services, namely, processing of fund transfer and fund receipt via credit card, debit card, bank account, mobile application or other electronically stored funds; Payment processing services in the field of credit card, debit card, bank account, mobile application or other electronically stored funds payments; Bank account services, namely, on-line banking services; Bank card services, namely, electronic card transaction processing; Personal banking services; Information services, namely, providing financial information and advice in the fields of finance, credit, debit, electronic funds, and banking; Financial affairs and monetary affairs, namely, financial information, management and analysis services; Real estate affairs, namely, real estate investment and financing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing and facilitating banking services in connection with electronic banking, electronic money transfer, electronic payments, and online banking; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for software for processing and facilitating banking services in connection with electronic banking, electronic money transfer, electronic payments, and online banking; Information services, namely, providing information relating to electronic banking, electronic money transfer, electronic payments, and online banking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |