USPTO serial 79276274
ARBORFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARBORFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL PARK
NEIL PARK LAW OFFICES OF NEIL PARKPO BOX 660475ARCADIA, CA 91066UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective apparel, namely, clothing for prevention against accidents, injury, irradiation, and fire; articles of protective clothing, gloves, footwear, balaclavas, face masks and shields, hard hats, head guards, headwear, protective ear muffs and covering shields, hard hats, head guards, headwear, protective helmets, visors, and eye wear to prevent accident or injury; eyewear for performance and/or leisure activities | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, balaclavas, beanies, belts, blouses, boots, bottoms as clothing, braces as suspenders, caps, coats, dresses, ear muffs, footwear, gloves, hats, headwear, hoodies, jackets, jeans, leggings, neck tubes, gaiters, and scarves, pajamas, pants, pullovers, scarves, shirts, shoes, shorts, skirts, smocks, socks, sweaters, sweatshirts, t-shirts, tops as clothing, trousers, underwear, vests; clothing, namely, balaclavas, beanies, belts, blouses, boots, bottoms as clothing, braces as suspenders, caps, coats, dresses, ear muffs, gloves, footwear, hats, headwear, hoodies, jackets, jeans, leggings, neck tubes, gaiters, and scarves, pajamas, pants, pullovers, scarves, shirts, shoes, shorts, skirts, smocks, socks, sweaters, sweatshirts, t-shirts, tops as clothing, trousers, underwear, vests for performance and/or leisure activities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 24, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |