USPTO serial 79276429
ALPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Consulting services for developing facilities for growing plants; construction of facilities for growing plants | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Construction planning | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Consultancy services relating to the cultivation of plants; designing facilities for growing plants | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |