USPTO serial 79276731
SIGNAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIGNAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelley S. Gordon
Kelley S. Gordon Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 South Wacker Drive6300 Willis TowerChicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and marketing services; marketing consultation services; business consulting services in the field of creation, delivery and measurement of effectiveness of digital advertising and marketing; online media monitoring services for commercial and advertising purposes, using computer software to automatically monitor internet websites, online publications and content, and other media for customer-specific topics and to capture relevant content on those topics, and providing documentation and analysis of that online content to others for business | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software that provides analysis of contents of websites and online publications to determine the relevance of the website for customer's marketing purposes; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for automated media monitoring services, namely, monitoring internet websites and online publications for customer-specified topics, and providing documentation and analysis of media content to others for business purposes; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for monitoring and analyzing legal, financial and regulatory data; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for data analysis of market and competitor trends; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for displaying, sharing, transmitting, tracking, tagging, collecting, analyzing, managing, uploading, and downloading images, photographs, electronic media, and a wide variety of data; application service provider (ASP) featuring software allowing others to tag, capture, analyze, target, share and monetize demographic, lifestyle, consumer purchasing decisions, and online behavioral data; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for web analytics and measuring consumer purchasing decisions, online behavioral data, web user behavior, brand awareness and brand engagement; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software to display, share, transmit, track, tag, collect, analyze, manage, upload, and download images, photographs, electronic media, and data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2025 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |