Drawing for NEXT MOBILITY

USPTO serial 79276939

NEXT MOBILITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NEXT MOBILITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Aircraft; remote control aircraft, other than toys; unmanned aerial vehicles; wheels for aircraft; chassis for aircraft; solid tires for aircraft wheels; pneumatic tires for aircraft; structural parts for airplanes; bodies for aircraft; airplane parts, namely, landing gear; flight control gears; airplanes; helicopters; tilt rotor aircraft; gyrocopters; electrically powered aircraft; drones; civilian drones; industrial drone; parts and fitting of aircraft; propellers for airplanes; airplane propellers; rotor blades for helicopters; propeller blade protectors for aircraft; aircraft landing gear wheels; tires for landing gear wheels for aircraft; parachutes; structural parts for gliders; structural parts for helicopter; gliders; jet aircraft; light aircraft; aerostats; propeller airplanes; turbo-jet airplanes; turbo-prop airplanes; helicopter; industrial unmanned helicopter; part and fitting of industrial unmanned helicopterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 15, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 14, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2020RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Apr 20, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 19, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 28, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance