USPTO serial 79277102
SPARK JOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPARK JOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo 158-0084, JP
Tokyo 158-0084, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EUNYOUNG LEE
EUNYOUNG LEE MONAMI LAW GROUP PLLC100 LARA ST. UNIT 508MANASSAS PARK, VA 20111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; cosmetic creams for skin care; milky lotions for skin care; beauty serums for skin care; toilet water for skin care; gel for skin care; essential oils for skin care; facial beauty masks; massage gels other than for medical purposes; facial peel preparations for cosmetic use; toilet water for facial peeling; milky lotions for facial peeling for cosmetic use; creams for facial peeling for cosmetic use; toilet water toners for cosmetic use; cleansing toilet water; skin whitening lotions; wrinkle resistant toilet water; facial toilet water; moisturizing toilet water; skin care cosmetics; blush; eye shadows; eye liner; moisturizing creams; massage creams; cosmetic massage creams; skin whitening creams; skin moisturizing gels; massage gels other than for medical purposes; skin whitening gel; skin cleansing creams; hand creams; sunscreen creams; hair lotions; shampoos; non-medicated hair treatments preparations for cosmetic purpose; hair care lotions; hair care gel; hair care creams; hair creams; hair spray; hair rinses; hair conditioners; pressed face powder; make-up powder; make-up primers; facial concealer; creamy foundation make-up; foundation powder make-up; liquid foundation make-up; lipstick; mascaras; eyebrow pencils; make-up removing gels; make-up removing toilet water; make-up removing oils; make-up removing creams; skin cleansing foams; cleansing milk for cosmetic purposes; nonmedicated cosmetics; nail polish; cosmetic sun protection gel; cosmetic sun protection spray; sun protection toilet water; lip glosses; facial washes; body washes; essential oils; soaps for personal use; detergent soap; facial soaps; body soaps; dentifrices; perfumery | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2021 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2020 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |