USPTO serial 79277119
SWISSGUARD REMOTE GUARDIANS, REAL TIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWISSGUARD REMOTE GUARDIANS, REAL TIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Alarm response and verification services; background investigation services; background investigation and research services; civil investigation services; consultancy services in the field of home security; consultation services in the field of the safety needs of commercial and industrial companies; day and night guards; guard services; monitoring of indicate security devices, namely, alarms, home security systems, for protecting personal property; monitoring of security alarm systems; monitoring of security systems; security consultancy; security guard services; security guarding for facilities; security inspection services for others; security screening of baggage; security services for buildings, namely, providing physical access to properties via a remote call-in locking device; security services, namely, conducting recovery operations for the recovery of property and personnel; security threat analysis for protecting personal safety; security threat analysis for protecting personal property; security threat analysis for protecting public safety | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |