USPTO serial 79277459
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $325
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia I. Reding
Patricia I. Reding Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP90 South Seventh Street2200 Wells Fargo CenterMinneapolis, MN 55402| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research and development in the field of peptide and protein engineering; research and development in the fields of gene synthesis, DNA sequencing, genomics, bioinformatics, protein engineering and/or drug discovery and development; research and development in the field of pharmaceuticals; research and development in the field of therapeutics; design, development and maintenance of robotic automation software in the fields of gene synthesis, DNA sequencing, genomics, bioinformatics, protein engineering and/or drug discovery and development; design, development and maintenance of software in the fields of gene synthesis, DNA sequencing, genomics, bioinformatics, protein engineering and/or drug discovery and development; design and development of pharmaceuticals using machine learning; drug development and discovery services; drug development services using machine learning; drug development services using robotic automation; scientific services for structure analysis, modification of antibodies, peptides and/or proteins; scientific services for the production of genetically-engineered antibodies, peptides and/or proteins for others, namely, scientific development services; scientific services for drug development and discovery; consulting services in the fields of biotechnology and pharmaceutical research; provision of information and data relating to research and development; scientific technical data analysis services; analysis and interpretation of scientific data using machine learning; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for data collection, data analytics and data interpretation, for use in the fields of therapeutics, gene synthesis, DNA sequencing, genomics, bioinformatics, protein engineering and/or drug discovery and development; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for data collection, data analytics and data interpretation, for use in the fields of therapeutics, gene synthesis, DNA sequencing, genomics, bioinformatics, protein engineering and/or drug discovery and development | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |