USPTO serial 79277648
OLG ONWARD / LUXURY / GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, AHSEN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLG ONWARD / LUXURY / GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Kelly
Timothy J. Kelly T.J. KELLY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PCPO Box 128Bay Head, NJ 08742UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | shoe bags; shoe bags for travel; trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas and parasols; baggage; credit card cases of leather; leather credit card holders; wallets; key-cases; trunks; travel garment covers; cosmetics bags, sold empty; sports bags included in this class; athletics bags; evening bags and shoulder bags for men; shopping bags made of skin; school book bags; beach bags; diaper bags; rucksacks; travelling cases; canvas bags; overnight bags; bags for climbers; satchels; formal handbags; vanity cases not fitted; cases and boxes of leather; briefcases; harness made from leather; leather leashes; credit card cases; music cases; pocket wallets; backpacks; handbags; bags for sports; travelling bags; pouches, of leather, for packaging; garment bags for travel; pouch baby carriers; valises | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; auctioneering; business research; commercial information and advice for consumers; import-export agencies; marketing research; marketing studies; modelling for advertising or sales promotion; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; organization of trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes; professional business consultancy; public relations; shop window dressing; wholesale store services relating to clothing; promoting the sale of goods and services of others through promotional events; consultancy regarding advertising communication strategies; consultancy regarding public relations communications strategy; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes; promoting the goods and services of others via computer and communication networks; advertising by transmission of on-line publicity for third parties through electronic communications networks; organisation of trade fairs; arranging of trade fairs; organization of art exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; business management of performing artists; arranging and conducting of art exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; promoting the artwork of others by means of providing online portfolios via a website; business management of conference centers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 19, 2020 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 7, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 22, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |