Drawing for AUSTRALIAN BOTANICAL SOAP

USPTO serial 79277754

AUSTRALIAN BOTANICAL SOAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MASON, JARED MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUSTRALIAN BOTANICAL SOAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TERENCE J. LINN

TERENCE J. LINN Gardner, Linn, Burkhart & Ondersma LLP2900 Charlevoix Drive SE, Suite 300Grand Rapids, MI 49546UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and laundry detergent for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; Body soaps; perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; hair lotions; dentifricesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 28, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 27, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 27, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 2023EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 4, 2023GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2023GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2023CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 15, 2022GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 15, 2022GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 15, 2022CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 6, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 8, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 12, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 8, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance