USPTO serial 79278101
MIDORI KUMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHAUD-KING, JILLIAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIDORI KUMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELIZABETH H. COHEN
ELIZABETH H. COHEN ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP1301 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, FLOOR 42NEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded and Downloadable computer software for use in the detection, scanning for, blocking, repair, controlling, and removal of computer viruses, threats, spam, spyware, malware, Trojans, worms, malware, botnets, rootkits, and other undesirable content or communications; Recorded and Downloadable computer software for use in managing and filtering electronic and wireless communications; Recorded and Downloadable computer software for use in protecting the integrity of data, computer networks, mobile devices, electronic and wireless communications and applications; Recorded and Downloadable computer software for use in creating and maintaining firewalls to prevent unauthorized access to and use of computer networks and systems; Recorded and Downloadable computer software for use in identifying and blocking electronic communications from illegitimate sources; Downloadable and recorded computer operating programs; Downloadable electronic publications in the form of manuals, books, brochures and newsletters in the field of detection and curing computer viruses, operating systems, and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Web site design consultancy; computer software design; installation of computer software; computer virus protection services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 24, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |