Drawing for ROBOLIVE

USPTO serial 79278748

ROBOLIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6121481Status 700Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 11, 2020
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 700: Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six.

Need help with ROBOLIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin M. Kerenyi

Justin M. Kerenyi HALL BOOTH SMITH, P.C.191 Peachtree Street NESuite 2900Atlanta, GA 30303

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer programs for controlling, regulating and simulating robots; downloadable computer programs for controlling, regulating and simulating robots and tools; robotic electrical control apparatus; both recorded and downloadable robotic process automation software (RPA software)ACTIVE—
042Installation and maintenance of computer programs; installation, maintenance and repair of software for computer systems; maintenance of software; rental of computers and computer software; IT consultancy, advisory and information services; rental of computer hardware and facilities; hosting services, namely software hosting and cloud hosting provider services and software as a service featuring software for process automation in the field of robotic factory automation, and rental of software; engineering services relating to robotics; consulting in the field of robotic factory automation IT project managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 11, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 26, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 19, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance