Drawing for LA MAR

USPTO serial 79278887

LA MAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LA MAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J. BROWN

MICHAEL J. BROWN MICHAEL J BROWN LAW OFFICE LLC354 EISENHOWER PARKWAYPLAZA 1, 2ND FLOOR, SUITE 2025LIVINGSTON, NJ 07039

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines; alcoholic beverages, except beerABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 21, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2021MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 21, 2021ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 21, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 21, 2021OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 8, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 14, 2020OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2020OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jul 10, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 18, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 17, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2020LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2020SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance