USPTO serial 79279076
B BENTLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B BENTLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Bromall Sparkman
Jessica Bromall Sparkman Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers; alcoholic carbonated beverages except beers; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; alcoholic cordials; alcoholic essences and extracts; alcoholic preparations for making beverages namely alcoholic essences; alcoholic wines; wine based beverages; alcoholic bitters; brandy; hard ciders; dessert wines; grain-based distilled alcoholic beverages; gin; liqueurs; mulled wine; prepared alcoholic cocktails; red wine; rice alcohol; rose wines; rum; sparkling fruit wine; sparkling wine; spirits; still wine; sweet wines; table wines; vodka; whiskey; white wine; wine-based drinks; wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |