USPTO serial 79279080
FRAICH'TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRAICH'TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, pressed, dried and cooked or deep-frozen fruits and vegetables; fruit and vegetable salads; dairy products; creams (dairy products); yogurts; soups, thick soups, broths; fresh, canned or deep-frozen prepared or cooked dishes or meals, based on meat, vegetables, fish, poultry or game; jams; marmalades; eggs; butter; cheeses; milk; fruits and vegetables, eggs and milk; all these goods being preserved, frozen or deep-frozen; potato chips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Edible ices; ice for refreshment; ice cream; sherbets (ices); iced desserts, namely, iced pastries; iced cakes; fresh or deep-frozen prepared or cooked dishes based on pasta, rice, quinoa, semolina, tapioca, cereals; tapioca; sago; cereal preparations, whether or not intended as an aperitif; biscuits and cookies for aperitifs; bread-based aperitif products; croutons; pasta-based aperitif products; noodles; honey; golden syrup; yeast; baking powder; salt; spices; fruit cakes; pizzas; quiches; tarts; pies; pancakes; cereals; flour-based foods; cereal preparations; tabbouleh; couscous; rice; pasta; meat pies; stuffed pasta; petits fours (cakes); sandwiches; bread; pastry; Viennese pastries; condiments; flavorings other than essential oils; seasonings; cooking herbs; aromatic preparations for food; mustard; vinegar; sauces (condiments); sauces for food; fruit coulis; creams (prepared dishes), namely, ice cream; muesli; cakes; rusks; sugar confectionery; confectionery; cookies; biscuits, sweet or savory; chocolates; all these goods being preserved, frozen or deep-frozen | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |