Drawing for VIONLABS

USPTO serial 79279399

VIONLABS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIONLABS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rhett V. Barney

Rhett V. Barney LEE & HAYES, PC601 W Riverside, Suite 1400Spokane, WA 99201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Data processing; collection of data; database marketing; advertising, marketing and promotional services; cinema advertising; advertising services; promoting a series of films for others; online retail store services for downloadable and pre-recorded music and movies; online advertising services; distribution of advertising, marketing and promotional material; development of marketing strategies and concepts; all the aforesaid not related to the optical field, medical field, clinics field and ophthalmological clinics fieldABANDONED—
038Streaming of audio, video and television via the internet; television and radio broadcasting services; online services, namely, message sending; providing online forums for transmission of messages; providing access to online computer databases; provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via an online video-on-demand service; all the aforesaid not related to the optical field, medical field, clinics field and ophthalmological clinics fieldABANDONED—
042Website hosting services, software as a service services featuring software for streaming of audio, video and television via the internet, and rental of application software; software design and development; development of software for audio and video operators; design of software for audio and video operators; platform as a service featuring computer software platforms for streaming of audio, video and television via the internet; all the aforesaid not related to the optical field, medical field, clinics field and ophthalmological clinics fieldABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2021IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Nov 10, 2021IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 1, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 30, 2020MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 2020LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 30, 2020ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2020LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 20, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 20, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 29, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 28, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance