USPTO serial 79279742
LAND OF TOMORROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTINS, ODETTE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAND OF TOMORROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Beverages containing wine (alcohol content 1 15% or more by volume); dry white wine; dry wine; fortified wines; ginger wine; mulled wines; non-sparkling wines; red wine; sparkling fruit wines; sparkling wines; still wines; beverages containing wine (wine predominating); sweet fortified wine; sweet red wine; sweet sparkling wine; sweet white wine; sweet wine; vintage wines; white wine; wine; blended wine; cooking wine; dessert wine; drinks containing wine (wine predominating); dry fortified wine; dry red wine; dry sparkling wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 19, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |