USPTO serial 79279894
SATCUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SATCUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Satellite television receiving apparatus; satellite communication apparatus; satellite broadcasting instruments; satellite apparatus; satellite finder meters; receiving antennas for satellite broadcast; satellite aerials; satellite dishes for satellite transmissions; extremely high frequency [EHF] satellite communications apparatus; super high frequency [SHF] satellite communications apparatus; satellite earth stations; satellite receiving apparatus; satellite transmission apparatus; satellite transmitters; satellite transceivers; satellite telephones | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Operation of satellite-to-earth receiver aerials; communication of information by satellite; communication via computer terminals, by digital transmission or by satellite; leasing satellite transmission capacity; transmission of pictures by satellite; transmission of data, sound and images via satellites; transmission of data via satellite; sound and picture transmission via satellite; transmission of sound and vision via satellite or interactive multimedia networks; transmission of audio and video content via satellite; communication services by satellite; satellite communication services for business users; telecommunications by computer terminals, via telematics, satellites, radios, telegraphs; telephones; rental of satellite broadcast receiving aerials; rental of broadcasting time by satellite; rental of satellite broadcasting sets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2020 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |