USPTO serial 79280251
SUPER-SCREW EVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6132842Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2020
- Examiner
- BERLIN, JUSTIN E
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SUPER-SCREW EVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MLT - MINET LACING TECHNOLOGY S.A.
FR
Other trademarks owned by MLT - MINET LACING TECHNOLOGY S.A.
MLT - MINET LACING TECHNOLOGY S.A.
FR
Other trademarks owned by MLT - MINET LACING TECHNOLOGY S.A.
MLT - MINET LACING TECHNOLOGY S.A.
FR
Other trademarks owned by MLT - MINET LACING TECHNOLOGY S.A.
Saint-Chamond, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MERCE HERNANDEZ GAZQUEZ
MERCE HERNANDEZ GAZQUEZ CURELL SUÑOL SLPMuntaner 240, 4-2BARCELONA, BARCELONA, ES 08021UNITED STATES OF AMERICAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Non-metallic flexible and extensible joints for conveyor belts, for finishing and repairing conveyor belts or other machine tool bells; non-metallic flexible and extensible joints for belts for round balers and for conveyor belts for industry, logistics and mining | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MLT - MINET LACING TECHNOLOGY S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MLT - MINET LACING TECHNOLOGY S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MLT - MINET LACING TECHNOLOGY S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MLT - MINET LACING TECHNOLOGY
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named SUPER-SCREW EVOLUTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |