Drawing for SISLAB

USPTO serial 79280294

SISLAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DYER, ERIN ZASKODA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SISLAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAE YOUN KIM

JAE YOUN KIM NOVICK, KIM & LEE, PLLC3251 OLD LEE HIGHWAYSUITE 404FAIRFAX, VA 22030

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; functional cosmetics; tissues impregnated with cosmetics; cosmetic pads; mask pack for cosmetic purposes; perfumes and colognes; cosmetics for massage; air fragrancing preparations; lip balm; mascara; nail varnish; moisturizing creams, lotions and gels; beauty soap; body and beauty care cosmetics; non-medicated toiletry preparations; non-medicated skin cleansers; eye liners; false eyelashes; dentifrices; bath and shower gelsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2020MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 5, 2020ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 5, 2020OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 5, 2020OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 14, 2020OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2020OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Aug 13, 2020OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 31, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 26, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 31, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 30, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 10, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance