USPTO serial 79280760
UJICHA JAPANESE TEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 2021
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with UJICHA JAPANESE TEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices, P.C.5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; frozen confectionery containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; confectionery, namely, candy and chocolate containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; bread containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; sandwiches containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; steamed buns stuffed with minced meat containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; hamburger sandwiches containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; pizzas containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; hot dog sandwiches containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; meat pies containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; seasonings other than spices containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; ice cream mixes containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; sherbet mixes containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; cereal preparations, namely, processed cereals, cereal-based snack foods, and breakfast cereals containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; chocolate spread containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region; instant confectionery mixes, namely, instant cake mixes, instant brownie mixes, instant muffin mixes, instant pudding mixes and instant doughnut mixes containing green tea made of tea leaves produced in four prefectures, namely, Kyoto, Nara, Shiga and Mie, and processed in Kyoto prefecture by local manufacturers with a method originating from the Uji region | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |