Drawing for PENINSOLA

USPTO serial 79280762

PENINSOLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PENINSOLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine; red wine; white wine; grape wine; rose wines; fruit wine; sparkling white wines; wine-based aperitifs; sparkling red wines; sparkling wines; table wines; dessert wines; sparkling fruit wine; sparkling grape wine; spirits being beverages; wine-based drinks; still wine; cooking wine; natural sparkling wines; low-alcoholic wineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2023CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 31, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 1, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 30, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 16, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance